Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2018-05-22 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 109.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has a score of 81.9, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A6's 75.8 global score. Google Pixel 4's body has the same weight than Galaxy A6, but it is a little bit thicker. The Google Pixel 4 has a faster processor than Galaxy A6, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4 has a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a lot greater pixel density, a bit bigger display and a lot higher 1080 x 2280 resolution. The Google Pixel 4 shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A6, because although it has a way worse resolution back camera, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Google Pixel 4 also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much higher 3840x2160 video quality.
The Galaxy A6 counts with a much better storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 400 GB. Samsung Galaxy A6 features a little longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 7% larger battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A6. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Galaxy A6, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.