Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2018-05-22 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 109.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL is just a bit better than the Galaxy A6, having an 82.9 score against 75.8. Although Google Pixel 4 XL is newer than the Galaxy A6, it is just a bit thicker and heavier. The Google Pixel 4 XL features a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a little bit larger display, a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 and a much greater pixels density.
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a better processing power than Galaxy A6, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A6 counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 400 GB.
Google Pixel 4 XL counts with better battery lifetime than Galaxy A6, because it has a 23% greater battery size. The Google Pixel 4 XL has just a bit better camera than Galaxy A6, because although it has a back camera with a much worse 12.2 megapixels resolution, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Google Pixel 4 XL also counts with a larger sensor which offers a higher image and video quality and a lot higher video definition.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy A6. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Samsung Galaxy A6, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.