Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-05-22 | 2020-11-19 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Clearly white and Just black |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 109.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a score of 87.5, which is much better than the Galaxy A6's 75.8 general score. Although the Google Pixel 4a 5G is extremely newer than Galaxy A6, it is a little bit thicker and a bit heavier. The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a little bit better performance than Galaxy A6, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a higher amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 4a 5G features a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a better display pixels density, a little bit bigger display and a way better 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a slightly better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A6, because although it has a lot lower resolution camera in the back, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a 3885mAh battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4a 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy A6. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Google Pixel 4a 5G, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy A6, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.