Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2018-05-22 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Metal | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 109.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is much better than Galaxy A6, having an 89 score against 75.8. Google Pixel 5 is a a lot newer and a little lighter cellphone than the Galaxy A6, although it is a bit thicker. The Google Pixel 5 has a little better processing power than Galaxy A6, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 5 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 5 counts with a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a higher amount of pixels per inch of display, a bit bigger screen and a way better 1080 x 2340 resolution. Google Pixel 5 has just a bit better camera than Galaxy A6, because although it has a camera in the back with a way lower resolution, and they both have a same size aperture, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with a larger sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality and a much better (4K) video definition.
The Google Pixel 5 has slightly more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. The Google Pixel 5 counts with a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has 4080mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 5 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A6. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Google Pixel 5, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Galaxy A6, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.