Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-05-22 | 2019-11-01 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Aurora black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 109.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ has a score of 82.7, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A6's 75.8 global score. Although LG G8X ThinQ is newer than Samsung Galaxy A6, it's somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker. LG G8X ThinQ features a brighter screen than Galaxy A6, because it has a higher pixels density, a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little bigger screen.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG G8X ThinQ features a quite better processing power than Galaxy A6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG G8X ThinQ also has 3 GB more RAM memory.
The LG G8X ThinQ features improved battery life than Galaxy A6, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The LG G8X ThinQ shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy A6, because although it has a way worse resolution camera in the back and a tinier aperture, it also counts with a larger camera sensor taking better quality videos and photos and a lot higher (4K) video definition.
Although LG G8X ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy A6. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy LG G8X ThinQ, else you can save some money and get the Samsung Galaxy A6, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.