Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-05-22 | 2020-11-06 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Titan gray |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 109.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 294 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG K92 has a global score of 85.4, which is better than Galaxy A6's 75.8 overall score. LG K92's design is notably newer, but incredibly heavier and just a little thicker than the Galaxy A6. LG K92 features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A6, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG K92 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
LG K92 features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a bigger display and a better screen density. The LG K92 features a much better camera than Galaxy A6, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking lot better quality photos, a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a lot more mega-pixels camera.
The LG K92 has a much better storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage. LG K92 counts with better battery performance than Galaxy A6, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although LG K92 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy A6. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A6, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.