Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-05-22 | 2020-05-20 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Holographic white |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 109.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 294 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Stylo 6 is a little bit better than Galaxy A6, having a 76.7 score against 75.8. Although the LG Stylo 6 is newer than Galaxy A6, it is much heavier and somewhat thicker. The LG Stylo 6 features a sharper display than Galaxy A6, because it has a bigger screen, a much better resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a higher pixel amount per screen inch.
LG Stylo 6 features a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and 32 GB more internal storage capacity. The LG Stylo 6 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG Stylo 6 also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A6 captures just a bit better photos and videos than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A6 also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking better quality pictures and videos, a larger aperture to take better photos in low-light environments and a camera with more MP.
LG Stylo 6 has better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Although LG Stylo 6 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Samsung Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy A6. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A6, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.