Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 68.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-05-22 | 2020-07-13 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 5.82 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.15 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Silver |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 109.00 | $ 110.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 1520 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 294 pixels per inch | 295 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 7.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2890mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A6 has an overall score of 75.8, which is much better than the LG Tribute Monarch's score of 68.6. The Samsung Galaxy A6 body is somewhat thinner than LG Tribute Monarch, but it's a little bit heavier and was released many years before. LG Tribute Monarch counts with just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a little larger display, a just a bit better pixel count per screen inch and a bit higher resolution of 720 x 1520.
The Samsung Galaxy A6 features a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than LG Tribute Monarch, and although they both have the same 32 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A6 also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 400 GB. LG Tribute Monarch counts with a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A6, although it has 1 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy A6 has a little bit better camera than LG Tribute Monarch, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Galaxy A6 also has a bigger aperture for better low light photos and videos, a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality and a more mega pixels back camera.
Galaxy A6 counts with a little longer battery performance than LG Tribute Monarch, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2890mAh.
Galaxy A6 not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.