Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-05-22 | 2018-03-09 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | 16 777 216 |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 109.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has a score of 82.5, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A6's 75.8 overall score. Even when the LG V30S ThinQ and Samsung Galaxy A6 were released only a few months apart, the LG V30S ThinQ is a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner. The LG V30S ThinQ features a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A6, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 3 GB more RAM memory.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a lot greater screen pixels density, a little bigger display and a way better 1440 x 2880 resolution. LG V30S ThinQ captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A6, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor shooting lower quality videos and pictures, and they both have a back facing camera with a 16 mega-pixels, the LG V30S ThinQ also counts with a lot higher (4K) video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and video in low light environments.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG V30S ThinQ features a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A6. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy LG V30S ThinQ, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Galaxy A6, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.