Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| 2018-05-22 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Black and Gray |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 109.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a global score of 81.3, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A6's global score of 75.8. The LG V35 ThinQ design is just a little lighter and a little thinner than Galaxy A6, even when both of them were released only a couple of months apart. LG V35 ThinQ has a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a much higher 1440 x 2880 resolution, a little bit larger display and a lot better number of pixels per inch of screen.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a better processor than Galaxy A6, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The LG V35 ThinQ has a superior memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal memory.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy A6, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. The LG V35 ThinQ features a little bit better camera than Galaxy A6, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor which provides a lower photo and video quality, and they both have a same resolution camera, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a bigger camera aperture and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Although LG V35 ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy A6. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy LG V35 ThinQ, else you can save some dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy A6, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.