Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-05-22 | 2020-03-20 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Blue and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 109.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 9.46 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is much better than the Galaxy A6, with a general score of 87.6 against 75.8. Although LG V60 ThinQ is newer than Galaxy A6, it is way heavier and thicker. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a greater screen density, a way better resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels and a bigger screen.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has 96 GB more internal storage and a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM.
LG V60 ThinQ features a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A6, because it has a 67% larger battery size. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light captures and videos, it also counts with a camera with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution, a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot bigger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and pictures.
Although LG V60 ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy A6. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the LG V60 ThinQ, else you can save some money and get the Samsung Galaxy A6, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.