Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-05-22 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 109.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing is a lot better than Samsung Galaxy A6, having a 91.2 score against 75.8. The LG Wing is a notably newer cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A6, but it's noticeably heavier and a lot thicker. LG Wing features a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a bigger screen, a way better 1080 x 2460 resolution and a higher pixels quantity per inch of screen.
The LG Wing has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A6, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG Wing has a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A6, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG Wing also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The LG Wing shoots a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy A6, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs and/or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a camera with lot more mega pixels, a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a much bigger sensor which gives a way better image and video quality.
The LG Wing counts with longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A6, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A6. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the LG Wing, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Galaxy A6, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.