Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-05-22 | 2021-08-19 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 109.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Pro is much better than Samsung Galaxy A6, getting a global score of 92.8 against 75.8. Although Motorola Edge 20 Pro is newer than the Samsung Galaxy A6, it is heavier and just a bit thicker. Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a brighter screen than Galaxy A6, because it has more pixels per inch of display, a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a larger display.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a superior processor than Galaxy A6, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has more RAM. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a much better memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro takes greater photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels. Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a much better battery duration than Galaxy A6, because it has a 50% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.