Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2018-05-22 | 2022-09-08 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 109.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is a bit better than Galaxy A6, having a global score of 80.9 against 75.8. Even though the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is noticeably newer than the Galaxy A6, it's a bit thicker and heavier. Galaxy A6 features a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has 5 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a much better screen than Galaxy A6, because it has a much better 1080 x 2400 resolution, more pixels per inch of display and a bigger screen. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with just a bit more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A6, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy A6, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures or videos in low light situations, it also counts with a much larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a back camera with lot more mega-pixels and a much higher video resolution.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a way better battery duration than Galaxy A6, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.