Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-05-22 | 2024-08-29 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 109.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a global score of 81.9, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A6's overall score of 75.8. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo construction is way newer, but just a little thicker and a little heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A6. Galaxy A6 counts with a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a lot better looking display than Galaxy A6, because it has a much higher display pixels density, a quite bigger display and a lot better resolution of 1256 x 2760px. Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much better camera than Galaxy A6, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking photos and video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a camera with lot more mega-pixels, a much better 3840x2160 video resolution and a lot larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A6, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a 44% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.