Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-05-22 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Metal | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 109.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than Samsung Galaxy A6, with an 87.1 score against 75.8. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's design is noticeably newer, but somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A6. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a greater pixels number in each screen inch, a larger screen and a lot better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 480 GB more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A6 features a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a very superior battery performance than Galaxy A6, because it has a 50 percent larger battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a way better video resolution, a way more mega-pixels camera, a larger aperture and a way larger back camera sensor capturing way higher quality pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.