Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2018-05-22 | 2020-07-08 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Surfing blue |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 109.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 294 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G 5G Plus is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A6, getting a overall score of 82.6 against 75.8. Although Moto G 5G Plus is incredibly newer than Samsung Galaxy A6, it's somewhat thicker and notably heavier. The Moto G 5G Plus counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A6, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a larger amount of RAM.
Moto G 5G Plus has a more vivid display than Galaxy A6, because it has a lot higher 1080 x 2520 resolution, a greater pixel density and a larger screen. Moto G 5G Plus takes a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy A6, and although they both have the same aperture, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a way larger sensor shooting much better quality videos and photos, a lot higher resolution camera in the back and a lot higher video definition.
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a superior memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has 32 GB more internal storage and a SD card slot that holds up to 1000 GB. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a 67% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.