Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-05-22 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Smoke black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 109.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 294 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G Power is slightly better than Galaxy A6, with a general score of 76.1 against 75.8. Even though the Moto G Power is newer than Galaxy A6, it's somewhat heavier and much thicker. Motorola Moto G Power counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Moto G Power also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Moto G Power counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a higher pixel amount per inch of display, a little bigger display and a much better 1080 x 2300 resolution. Moto G Power features a bit better camera than Galaxy A6, and although they both have a camera with a 16 MP resolution, the same aperture and a same size back camera sensor, the Moto G Power also has a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Moto G Power features a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Moto G Power features a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Moto G Power is a better device, it costs more money than the Samsung Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy A6. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Samsung Galaxy A6, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.