Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-05-22 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 109.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z Force has a global score of 75.8, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A6's 75.8 score. Although Motorola Moto Z Force is older and a little heavier than Galaxy A6, it's construction is still just a little bit thinner. Moto Z Force has a much better looking screen than Galaxy A6, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a lot better quantity of pixels per inch in the display.
The Moto Z Force has a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has more internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. Moto Z Force counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy A6, because although it has lesser cpu cores , it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto Z Force features a little longer battery duration than Galaxy A6, because it has a 17 percent larger battery size. Moto Z Force counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for taking photos in low light situations, it also counts with a way better (4K) video resolution and a camera in the back with much more megapixels.
Although Moto Z Force is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A6. If you prefer to save some money, you can get Galaxy A6, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.