Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2018-05-22 | 2017-08-10 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | 16 777 216 |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 109.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto Z2 Force Edition has a general score of 77.4, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A6's 75.8 global score. Moto Z2 Force Edition's design is somewhat lighter and extremely thinner than the Galaxy A6, even though it was released about 10 months before. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better pixel density and a lot higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. Moto Z2 Force Edition has a little bit better camera than Galaxy A6, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light images and videos, a smaller back camera sensor and a much less MP resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Moto Z2 Force Edition has a superior memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has 32 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy A6 features a bit better battery duration than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 3000mAh battery size instead of 2730mAh.
Although Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy A6. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get Samsung Galaxy A6, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.