Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2018-05-22 | 2017-06-29 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Metal | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 109.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto Z2 Play has a general score of 77.4, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A6's 75.8 overall score. Although the Moto Z2 Play is older than the Galaxy A6, it's construction is notably thinner and lighter. The Motorola Moto Z2 Play counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy A6, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a greater number of pixels per inch of screen.
Motorola Moto Z2 Play has just a little better processing power than Galaxy A6, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola Moto Z2 Play also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Moto Z2 Play counts with a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and more internal memory.
Moto Z2 Play's battery life is just as good as the Galaxy A6 one. The Moto Z2 Play's camera is just as good as the camera in Galaxy A6, because although the Moto Z2 Play has a much less megapixels back-facing camera, and they both have a F1.7 aperture, it also counts with a lot better video definition.
Although Motorola Moto Z2 Play is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy A6. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Motorola Moto Z2 Play, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Galaxy A6, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.