Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-05-22 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 109.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 294 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper is slightly better than Galaxy A6, getting a 79.8 score against 75.8. The Motorola One Hyper is a newer phone than the Galaxy A6, although it's somewhat heavier and thicker. Motorola One Hyper counts with just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A6, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola One Hyper also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Motorola One Hyper has a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a bigger screen, a better screen density and a much better 1080 x 2340px resolution. Motorola One Hyper has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a camera with way more MP and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A6, because it has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola One Hyper has better battery duration than Galaxy A6, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Motorola One Hyper is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A6. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Motorola One Hyper, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy A6, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.