Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-05-22 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 109.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has a global score of 87, which is better than the Galaxy A6's global score of 75.8. Motorola razr (2020)'s design is a lot newer than Galaxy A6's, but it's somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker. Motorola razr (2020) counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy A6, because it has a bit bigger display, a greater quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a better 876 x 2142 resolution.
The Motorola razr (2020) features just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a higher amount of RAM. Motorola razr (2020) features a much bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy A6, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy A6 features a little longer battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola razr (2020) captures a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy A6, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a lot better 48 MP resolution camera, a way bigger sensor taking much better quality videos and pictures and a lot better (4K) video definition.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy A6. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Motorola razr (2020), but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy A6, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.