Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 15 |
| 2018-05-22 | 2025-04-24 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | -- |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 109.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 7 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 294 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A6, getting a overall score of 79.2 against 75.8. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) design is extremely newer and a lot thinner, but also heavier than Samsung Galaxy A6. Galaxy A6 features an incredibly better looking display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a really smaller display.
Galaxy A6 features a much faster processor than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 13 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) shoots way better videos and photos than Galaxy A6, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light photos and video, it also counts with a much better video resolution and a back camera with way more mega-pixels.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a lot bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a much longer battery performance than Galaxy A6, because it has a 4700mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.