Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-05-22 | 2020-11-12 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Meteor grey |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 109.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 294 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW is slightly better than Galaxy A6, with a score of 80.3 against 75.8. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a way newer cellphone than Galaxy A6, but it is thicker and incredibly heavier. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400, a higher display density and a larger screen.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a much bigger memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW captures greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor shooting way better quality pictures and videos, a way higher 64 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a much higher (4K) video quality.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Although Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy A6. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Nokia 8 V 5G UW, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Galaxy A6, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.