Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-05-22 | 2019-10-16 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Cyber shade |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 109.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The nubia Red Magic 3S has an overall score of 75.8, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A6's overall score of 75.8. Although nubia Red Magic 3S is newer than Galaxy A6, it is noticeably heavier and much thicker. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a superior processing power than Galaxy A6, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 9 GB more RAM.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a much better screen than Galaxy A6, because it has a higher screen density, a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a larger screen. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A6, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage.
Nubia Red Magic 3S takes way better pictures and videos than Galaxy A6, and although they both have the same aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a way better video definition, a lot bigger sensor taking lot higher quality photographs and videos and a back facing camera with a much better resolution.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a superior battery performance than Galaxy A6, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Although nubia Red Magic 3S is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A6. If you want to save some dollars, you can get Galaxy A6, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.