Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-05-22 | 2020-09-02 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Sonic silver |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 109.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 5S is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A6, getting a 76.2 score against 75.8. The nubia Red Magic 5S construction is noticeably newer than Samsung Galaxy A6's, although it's notably thicker and much heavier. Nubia Red Magic 5S features a sharper screen than Galaxy A6, because it has a larger display, a greater pixel density and a much better 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a slightly better storage to install applications and games than Galaxy A6, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Nubia Red Magic 5S features a better hardware performance than Galaxy A6, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a greater amount of RAM.
Nubia Red Magic 5S captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy A6, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a back facing camera with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution, a way larger back camera sensor capturing way better quality videos and photos and a way higher video resolution.
Nubia Red Magic 5S has a much longer battery duration than Galaxy A6, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although nubia Red Magic 5S is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy A6. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy nubia Red Magic 5S, else you can save some money and buy the Samsung Galaxy A6, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.