Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-05-22 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | -- |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 109.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is way better than the Samsung Galaxy A6, with a score of 91.3 against 75.8. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G body is notably newer than the Samsung Galaxy A6's, but it is heavier and a little thicker. Galaxy A52 5G features a little faster CPU than Galaxy A6, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A52 5G also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a much better display than Galaxy A6, because it has a lot higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, more pixels per inch in the display and a bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G captures a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy A6, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a back-facing camera with way more megapixels, a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition and a lot larger sensor taking way higher quality photographs and videos.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A6, because it has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy A52 5G features a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a 50% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.