Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-05-22 | 2020-07-16 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Prism bricks black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 109.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 294 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy A6, getting a score of 92.9 against 75.8. The Galaxy A71 5G UW design is notably newer than the Samsung Galaxy A6's, but it's heavier and a little thicker. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a sharper screen than Galaxy A6, because it has a larger screen, a better pixels density and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy A6, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting photographs in low-light situations, it also counts with a lot higher resolution back camera, a much bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a much longer battery duration than Galaxy A6, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Galaxy A71 5G UW is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy A6. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Samsung Galaxy A6, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.