Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-05-22 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 109.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is a lot better than Samsung Galaxy A6, having a global score of 97.6 against 75.8. The Galaxy Fold construction is newer and just a bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A6's, although it's incredibly heavier. The Galaxy Fold has a more powerful CPU than Galaxy A6, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy A6, because it has a way higher resolution of 1536 x 2152px, a way larger display and a just a bit more pixels per display inch. Galaxy Fold counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has a way lower 12 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking higher quality videos and photos, a larger camera aperture and a much better video resolution.
The Galaxy Fold has a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. The Galaxy Fold counts with a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a 46% bigger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A6. If you want to save some dollars, you can get Galaxy A6, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.