Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2018-05-22 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 109.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 294 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is better than Galaxy A6, with a score of 90.8 against 75.8. Samsung Galaxy Note 20's construction is newer than Galaxy A6's, although it's heavier and just a little thicker. Galaxy Note 20 has a superior performance than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Note 20 also has 5 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a more vivid screen than Galaxy A6, because it has a higher display pixels density, a larger display and a lot higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. The Galaxy Note 20 features a slightly bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy A6, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a superior camera than Galaxy A6, because although it has a way less megapixels camera and a tinier aperture which is not good for capturing photographs or video in low light situations, it also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot higher image and video quality and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Galaxy Note 20 counts with a very superior battery duration than Galaxy A6, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy A6. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Samsung Galaxy A6, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.