Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-05-22 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 109.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than Samsung Galaxy A6, getting a 98.9 score against 75.8. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's design is incredibly newer than Samsung Galaxy A6's, but it's a little thicker and noticeably heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a more powerful CPU than Galaxy A6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy A6, because it has a way better resolution of 1440 x 3088, a larger display and a way higher display density. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A6, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much better camera than Galaxy A6, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a much larger camera sensor taking way better quality photographs and videos, a camera in the back with much more mega pixels and a way higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a superior battery duration than Galaxy A6, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy A6. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy A6, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.