Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2018-05-22 | 2019-08-23 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 109.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 is better than Galaxy A6, having an 89 score against 75.8. Although Galaxy Note10 is newer than the Galaxy A6, it is a little heavier and just a little bit thicker. Galaxy Note10 features a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a lot higher 1080 x 2280 resolution, a greater display density and a little larger display.
Galaxy Note10 features a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A6, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a better performing CPU than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Note10 has just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A6, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. Samsung Galaxy Note10 takes clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A6, because although it has a lot less megapixels back-facing camera, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a larger diafragm aperture to take better photos in low-light environments and a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A6. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy the Galaxy A6, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.