Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2018-05-22 | 2013-09-25 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Black, Pink and White |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 109.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note3 has a global score of 77.7, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A6's 75.8 overall score. Despite being the best cellphone in this comparison, Galaxy Note3's body is noticeably older, a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier than the Galaxy A6. Galaxy Note3 features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A6, although it has a lower number of cores , they both have a 3 GB RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note3 counts with just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a bit larger screen, more pixels per inch of screen and a higher resolution of 1080 x 1920px. Galaxy Note3 features slightly more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A6, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits 336 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage.
Galaxy Note3 has a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a 3200mAh battery size. Galaxy Note3 has a little bit better camera than Galaxy A6, because although it has a much smaller camera aperture which is not so good for shooting photographs in low light environments, a tinier back-facing camera sensor which offers a lower photo and video quality and a back facing camera with less mega pixels, it also counts with a much higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.