Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-05-22 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 109.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than Samsung Galaxy A6, getting a global score of 98 against 75.8. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's body is newer, but a lot heavier and thicker than Samsung Galaxy A6. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a quite superior hardware performance than Galaxy A6, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy A6, because it has a lot higher count of pixels per display inch, a lot better 1440 x 3200 resolution and a bigger screen. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A6, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low light captures and videos, it also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and pictures, a way better video quality and a way more MP camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a superior memory to install applications and games than Galaxy A6, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a really longer battery duration than Galaxy A6, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than Samsung Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy A6. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Samsung Galaxy A6, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.