Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2018-05-22 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 109.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot better than Galaxy A6, having a general score of 95.4 against 75.8. Even though Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is much newer than Galaxy A6, it's somewhat thicker and a lot heavier. Galaxy S22 Ultra features a lot better display than Galaxy A6, because it has a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a larger display and a way greater number of pixels per inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a little bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A6, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The Galaxy S22 Ultra takes way better videos and photos than Galaxy A6, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs and/or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution, a lot better 7680x4320 video quality and a lot larger sensor taking lot better quality videos and photos.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A6. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Galaxy A6, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.