Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-05-22 | -- |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 5.71 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | -- |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 109.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 is slightly better than Galaxy A6, with an 82.6 score against 75.8. Galaxy S25 is a incredibly thinner and noticeably lighter cellphone than the Galaxy A6. The Galaxy S25 has a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a quite bigger screen, a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a better amount of pixels per screen inch.
Galaxy A6 counts with a much better processing power than Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Samsung Galaxy S25 captures greater photographs and videos than Galaxy A6, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a camera in the back with much more mega pixels, a lot better 7680x4320 video definition and a lot bigger sensor shooting way better quality photos.
The Galaxy S25 features a little bit better storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy S25 features improved battery duration than Galaxy A6, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A6. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Galaxy A6, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.