Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-05-22 | -- |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 5.71 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | -- |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 109.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has an overall score of 90.7, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy A6's 75.8 general score. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a notably lighter and incredibly thinner phone than Samsung Galaxy A6. Galaxy A6 counts with an extremely better processing unit than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a lot better looking display than Galaxy A6, because it has a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3088, a lot more pixels per display inch and a bigger display. Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A6, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a lot larger camera sensor which provides a lot better image and video quality, a way higher video definition and a much higher resolution camera.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a 67% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.