Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-05-22 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Black |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 109.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 294 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has an overall score of 80.1, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A6's 75.8 general score. Galaxy XCover FieldPro's construction is newer, but notably heavier and thicker than Galaxy A6. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better display pixels density and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB and 64 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little faster processor than Galaxy A6, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a very superior battery duration than Galaxy A6, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A6 shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light photography and video and a smaller sensor providing a lower image quality, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A6 also counts with a lot higher resolution back-facing camera.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A6. If you want to save some money, you can get Galaxy A6, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.