Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-05-22 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Black |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 109.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 294 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a general score of 81, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A6's 75.8 global score. Galaxy XCover Pro is a newer cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A6, but it's much thicker and much heavier. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a better display than Galaxy A6, because it has a higher pixels amount in each display inch, a little bit larger display and a lot higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Galaxy XCover Pro has a much better storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB and 32 GB more internal memory.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has a lot smaller sensor giving a lot worse image quality, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same aperture and the same (Full HD) video definition, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a much higher 25 megapixels resolution back camera.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy A6. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Samsung Galaxy A6, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.