Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-05-22 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 109.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is better than Galaxy A6, with a score of 88.5 against 75.8. The Galaxy Z Flip design is newer and a little bit thinner than Galaxy A6's, but it's heavier. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a much better looking screen than Galaxy A6, because it has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2636px, a bigger screen and a higher quantity of pixels per display inch.
Galaxy Z Flip has a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A6, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Galaxy Z Flip has a quite better hardware performance than Galaxy A6, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy Z Flip takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A6, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for shooting pictures and videos in low-light situations and a back-facing camera with a lot lower resolution, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor providing a better image quality and a lot better (4K) video definition.
Galaxy Z Flip has a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A6. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, otherwise you can save some money and get the Galaxy A6, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.