Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-05-22 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 109.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy A6's 75.8 overall score. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G's design is a lot newer and just a bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A6's, although it's somewhat heavier. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a larger display, a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px and a greater display density.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a greater performance than Galaxy A6, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 5 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has a smaller aperture and a lot less megapixels resolution camera, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a bigger sensor which gives a better photo and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A6, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A6. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Galaxy A6, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.