Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-05-22 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 109.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way better than Galaxy A6, with a 94.6 score against 75.8. Galaxy Z Fold 2's design is way newer and a little thinner than Galaxy A6's, although it is much heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a better CPU than Galaxy A6, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a much higher resolution of 1768 x 2208px, a better amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a way larger screen. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a better camera than Galaxy A6, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting photos and video in poorly lited environments and a back facing camera with a way lower resolution, it also counts with a much larger sensor and a much better (4K) video quality.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a much longer battery performance than Galaxy A6, because it has a 50 percent larger battery size.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A6. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy Z Fold 2, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Galaxy A6, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.