Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2015-12-16 | 2021-09-24 |
| 5.96 x 2.92 x 0.29 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro has a global score of 93.3, which is much better than the Galaxy A7 (2016)'s 72.8 score. Apple iPhone 13 Pro's design is much newer, but heavier and just a little thicker than the Galaxy A7 (2016). The Apple iPhone 13 Pro counts with a much better hardware performance than Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit and a higher amount of RAM memory.
The iPhone 13 Pro counts with a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a higher 1170 x 2532 resolution, a little bigger display and a little bit higher number of pixels per display inch. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro counts with a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has a camera in the back with a worse resolution, it also counts with a way larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos and a much better 3840x2160 video resolution. Galaxy A7 (2016) counts with just a bit better battery performance than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 7 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.