Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2015-12-16 | 2021-09-24 |
| 5.96 x 2.92 x 0.29 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is a lot better than Galaxy A7 (2016), with a 93.2 score against 72.8. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max's body is a lot newer, but heavier and a bit thicker than the Galaxy A7 (2016). The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max features a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a little better pixel density, a higher resolution of 1284 x 2778 pixels and a larger screen.
IPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games than Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a way better hardware performance than Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has 2 lesser cpu cores , it also counts with 3 GB more RAM and a 64-bits processor.
The iPhone 13 Pro Max has improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has 4352mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a better camera than Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has a back camera with a lower resolution, it also counts with a lot higher video resolution and a much larger aperture for better low-light photography and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.