Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| 2015-12-16 | 2017-11-03 |
| 5.96 x 2.92 x 0.29 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X is much better than the Galaxy A7 (2016), having an 88.1 score against 72.8. Apple iPhone X's design is newer, but a bit heavier and just a bit thicker than the Galaxy A7 (2016). IPhone X has a better display than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a quite better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, a quite larger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels.
Apple iPhone X features a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The iPhone X counts with a faster processor than Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster), and they both have a 3 GB RAM, the iPhone X also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
The Galaxy A7 (2016) has better battery life than Apple iPhone X, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity. Apple iPhone X has a superior camera than Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has a camera with lesser megapixels, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video resolution and a larger aperture to capture better images in low light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.