Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| 2015-12-16 | 2018-10-26 |
| 5.96 x 2.92 x 0.29 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XR has a score of 82, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016)'s 72.8 overall score. The Apple iPhone XR is a a lot newer phone than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), although it's thicker and heavier. Apple iPhone XR counts with a greater processing power than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Apple iPhone XR also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
IPhone XR counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has a bit worse amount of pixels per inch of screen and a bit lower 828 x 1792 resolution, it also counts with a bit larger display. Apple iPhone XR shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has a lesser mega-pixels camera in the back, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video quality and a bigger aperture.
Apple iPhone XR has a greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A7 (2016) has a little longer battery performance than iPhone XR, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 2942mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.