Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2015-12-16 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.96 x 2.92 x 0.29 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has a global score of 80, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A7 (2016)'s 72.8 general score. The Google Pixel 3 is a much newer and somewhat lighter phone than the Galaxy A7 (2016), although it's a little thicker. The Google Pixel 3 features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Google Pixel 3 also has a bit greater pixel count in each inch of display and a slightly better 1080 x 2160px resolution.
Google Pixel 3 features a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 48 GB more internal storage. Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 3 also has more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 3 has a slightly better camera than Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has a back facing camera with less MP, it also counts with a bigger aperture and a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution. Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016) features just a bit better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 3300mAh battery size instead of 2915mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.