Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2015-12-16 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.96 x 2.92 x 0.29 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL is better than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), having an 80.7 score against 72.8. Google Pixel 3 XL's design is way newer, but just a little heavier and a little thicker than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016). The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a bit bigger display, a much better 1440 x 2960 resolution and more pixels per screen inch.
The Google Pixel 3 XL has a better storage to install games and applications than Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory. The Google Pixel 3 XL features a little faster processor than Galaxy A7 (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 3 XL also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has a back-facing camera with a lower resolution, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a larger camera aperture to capture better low light captures. The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a little longer battery performance than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a 4% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.