Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2015-12-16 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.96 x 2.92 x 0.29 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is better than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), getting a general score of 81.9 against 72.8. Google Pixel 4 is a notably newer and just a little lighter phone than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), but it is also a little bit thicker. Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A7 (2016), because it has a quite higher pixels amount per screen inch, a little bit larger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2280 resolution.
Google Pixel 4 has more memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 48 GB more internal storage. Google Pixel 4 has a superior processing power than Galaxy A7 (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has 3 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A7 (2016) has greater battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has an 18% bigger battery size. Google Pixel 4 takes a little bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016), because although it has a lower 12.2 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a bigger aperture to capture better images in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.